| Nova Micro 1.0 | Phi 4 | |
|---|---|---|
| Input, per 1M tokens | $0.035 | $0.07 |
| Output, per 1M tokens | $0.14 | $0.14 |
| Context window | 128K | 16K |
| Classification or routing (600 tokens in, 10 out), per 1,000 | $0.0224 | $0.0434 |
| Chat reply (2,000 in, 400 out), per 1,000 | $0.126 | $0.196 |
| Retrieval-augmented answer (8,000 in, 500 out), per 1,000 | $0.35 | $0.63 |
| Confidence signal | no | no |
| Tool calling | yes | no |
Which one should carry your traffic?
If Nova Micro 1.0 answers your requests as well as Phi 4, moving that traffic saves 36% on chat-shaped requests. Averages cannot tell you whether it does for your requests. Nova Micro 1.0 does not expose a confidence signal through OpenRouter, so Gimbix would test it as a full replacement rather than a first answer.
Nova Micro 1.0 profile · Phi 4 profile · Measure it on your traffic