| Nova Premier 1.0 | Kimi K2.6 | |
|---|---|---|
| Input, per 1M tokens | $2.50 | $0.65 |
| Output, per 1M tokens | $12.50 | $3.41 |
| Context window | 1M | 262K |
| Classification or routing (600 tokens in, 10 out), per 1,000 | $1.63 | $0.424 |
| Chat reply (2,000 in, 400 out), per 1,000 | $10.00 | $2.66 |
| Retrieval-augmented answer (8,000 in, 500 out), per 1,000 | $26.25 | $6.91 |
| Confidence signal | no | yes |
| Tool calling | yes | yes |
| BANKING77, correct of 400 | not measured | 323 |
Which one should carry your traffic?
If Kimi K2.6 answers your requests as well as Nova Premier 1.0, moving that traffic saves 73% on chat-shaped requests. Averages cannot tell you whether it does for your requests. Kimi K2.6 exposes a confidence signal, so Gimbix can let it answer first and hand unsure cases to Nova Premier 1.0.
Nova Premier 1.0 profile · Kimi K2.6 profile · Measure it on your traffic