Home / Compare / Claude Fable 5.1 vs Command R7B (12-2024)

Claude Fable 5.1 vs Command R7B (12-2024)

For a typical chat reply (2,000 tokens in, 400 out), Claude Fable 5.1 costs 296× as much as Command R7B (12-2024): $40.00 against $0.135 per 1,000 requests at list price on 2026-09-28.

Claude Fable 5.1Command R7B (12-2024)
Input, per 1M tokens$10.00$0.0375
Output, per 1M tokens$50.00$0.15
Context window1M128K
Classification or routing (600 tokens in, 10 out), per 1,000$6.50$0.024
Chat reply (2,000 in, 400 out), per 1,000$40.00$0.135
Retrieval-augmented answer (8,000 in, 500 out), per 1,000$105$0.375
Confidence signalnono
Tool callingyesno

Which one should carry your traffic?

If Command R7B (12-2024) answers your requests as well as Claude Fable 5.1, moving that traffic saves 100% on chat-shaped requests. Averages cannot tell you whether it does for your requests. Command R7B (12-2024) does not expose a confidence signal through OpenRouter, so Gimbix would test it as a full replacement rather than a first answer.

Claude Fable 5.1 profile · Command R7B (12-2024) profile · Measure it on your traffic