Home / Compare / Claude Sonnet 5 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731

Claude Sonnet 5 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731

For a typical chat reply (2,000 tokens in, 400 out), Claude Sonnet 5 costs 47× as much as DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731: $8.00 against $0.17 per 1,000 requests at list price on 2026-09-28.

Claude Sonnet 5DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731
Input, per 1M tokens$2.00$0.021
Output, per 1M tokens$10.00$0.32
Context window1M1.31M
Classification or routing (600 tokens in, 10 out), per 1,000$1.30$0.0158
Chat reply (2,000 in, 400 out), per 1,000$8.00$0.17
Retrieval-augmented answer (8,000 in, 500 out), per 1,000$21.00$0.328
Confidence signalnoyes
Tool callingyesyes
BANKING77, correct of 400308298

Which one should carry your traffic?

If DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 answers your requests as well as Claude Sonnet 5, moving that traffic saves 98% on chat-shaped requests. Averages cannot tell you whether it does for your requests. DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 exposes a confidence signal, so Gimbix can let it answer first and hand unsure cases to Claude Sonnet 5.

Claude Sonnet 5 profile · DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 profile · Measure it on your traffic