Home / Compare / Command A vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Command A vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash

For a typical chat reply (2,000 tokens in, 400 out), Command A costs 23× as much as MiMo-V2.6-Flash: $9.00 against $0.392 per 1,000 requests at list price on 2026-09-28.

Command AMiMo-V2.6-Flash
Input, per 1M tokens$2.50$0.14
Output, per 1M tokens$10.00$0.28
Context window256K1.05M
Classification or routing (600 tokens in, 10 out), per 1,000$1.60$0.0868
Chat reply (2,000 in, 400 out), per 1,000$9.00$0.392
Retrieval-augmented answer (8,000 in, 500 out), per 1,000$25.00$1.26
Confidence signalnono
Tool callingnoyes
BANKING77, correct of 400not measured326

Which one should carry your traffic?

If MiMo-V2.6-Flash answers your requests as well as Command A, moving that traffic saves 96% on chat-shaped requests. Averages cannot tell you whether it does for your requests. MiMo-V2.6-Flash does not expose a confidence signal through OpenRouter, so Gimbix would test it as a full replacement rather than a first answer.

Command A profile · MiMo-V2.6-Flash profile · Measure it on your traffic