Home / Compare / DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Qwen3.7 Flash

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Qwen3.7 Flash

For a typical chat reply (2,000 tokens in, 400 out), DeepSeek V4.1 Flash costs 2.7× as much as Qwen3.7 Flash: $0.299 against $0.112 per 1,000 requests at list price on 2026-09-28.

DeepSeek V4.1 FlashQwen3.7 Flash
Input, per 1M tokens$0.0295$0.03
Output, per 1M tokens$0.60$0.13
Context window1.05M1M
Classification or routing (600 tokens in, 10 out), per 1,000$0.0237$0.0193
Chat reply (2,000 in, 400 out), per 1,000$0.299$0.112
Retrieval-augmented answer (8,000 in, 500 out), per 1,000$0.536$0.305
Confidence signalyesyes
Tool callingyesyes
BANKING77, correct of 400316286

Which one should carry your traffic?

If Qwen3.7 Flash answers your requests as well as DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, moving that traffic saves 63% on chat-shaped requests. Averages cannot tell you whether it does for your requests. Qwen3.7 Flash exposes a confidence signal, so Gimbix can let it answer first and hand unsure cases to DeepSeek V4.1 Flash.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash profile · Qwen3.7 Flash profile · Measure it on your traffic