Home / Compare / DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs GLM 5.3 Flash

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs GLM 5.3 Flash

For a typical chat reply (2,000 tokens in, 400 out), GLM 5.3 Flash costs 2.9× as much as DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731: $0.50 against $0.17 per 1,000 requests at list price on 2026-09-28.

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731GLM 5.3 Flash
Input, per 1M tokens$0.021$0.15
Output, per 1M tokens$0.32$0.50
Context window1.31M1.31M
Classification or routing (600 tokens in, 10 out), per 1,000$0.0158$0.095
Chat reply (2,000 in, 400 out), per 1,000$0.17$0.50
Retrieval-augmented answer (8,000 in, 500 out), per 1,000$0.328$1.45
Confidence signalyesyes
Tool callingyesyes
BANKING77, correct of 400298320

Which one should carry your traffic?

If DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 answers your requests as well as GLM 5.3 Flash, moving that traffic saves 66% on chat-shaped requests. Averages cannot tell you whether it does for your requests. DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 exposes a confidence signal, so Gimbix can let it answer first and hand unsure cases to GLM 5.3 Flash.

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 profile · GLM 5.3 Flash profile · Measure it on your traffic