Home / Compare / DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 vs Qwen3.8 Flash

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 vs Qwen3.8 Flash

For a typical chat reply (2,000 tokens in, 400 out), DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 costs 5.5× as much as Qwen3.8 Flash: $2.67 against $0.488 per 1,000 requests at list price on 2026-09-28.

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423Qwen3.8 Flash
Input, per 1M tokens$0.955$0.15
Output, per 1M tokens$1.91$0.47
Context window1.05M1M
Classification or routing (600 tokens in, 10 out), per 1,000$0.592$0.0947
Chat reply (2,000 in, 400 out), per 1,000$2.67$0.488
Retrieval-augmented answer (8,000 in, 500 out), per 1,000$8.60$1.44
Confidence signalyesyes
Tool callingyesyes
BANKING77, correct of 400not measured316

Which one should carry your traffic?

If Qwen3.8 Flash answers your requests as well as DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423, moving that traffic saves 82% on chat-shaped requests. Averages cannot tell you whether it does for your requests. Qwen3.8 Flash exposes a confidence signal, so Gimbix can let it answer first and hand unsure cases to DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423.

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 profile · Qwen3.8 Flash profile · Measure it on your traffic