| Nemotron 3 Ultra | GPT-5.4 Nano | |
|---|---|---|
| Input, per 1M tokens | $0.60 | $0.20 |
| Output, per 1M tokens | $2.40 | $1.25 |
| Context window | 262K | 400K |
| Classification or routing (600 tokens in, 10 out), per 1,000 | $0.384 | $0.133 |
| Chat reply (2,000 in, 400 out), per 1,000 | $2.16 | $0.90 |
| Retrieval-augmented answer (8,000 in, 500 out), per 1,000 | $6.00 | $2.23 |
| Confidence signal | no | no |
| Tool calling | yes | yes |
Which one should carry your traffic?
If GPT-5.4 Nano answers your requests as well as Nemotron 3 Ultra, moving that traffic saves 58% on chat-shaped requests. Averages cannot tell you whether it does for your requests. GPT-5.4 Nano does not expose a confidence signal through OpenRouter, so Gimbix would test it as a full replacement rather than a first answer.
Nemotron 3 Ultra profile · GPT-5.4 Nano profile · Measure it on your traffic