Home / Compare / Qwen3.7 Flash vs GLM 5.3

Qwen3.7 Flash vs GLM 5.3

For a typical chat reply (2,000 tokens in, 400 out), GLM 5.3 costs 22× as much as Qwen3.7 Flash: $2.41 against $0.112 per 1,000 requests at list price on 2026-09-28.

Qwen3.7 FlashGLM 5.3
Input, per 1M tokens$0.03$0.325
Output, per 1M tokens$0.13$4.40
Context window1M1.31M
Classification or routing (600 tokens in, 10 out), per 1,000$0.0193$0.239
Chat reply (2,000 in, 400 out), per 1,000$0.112$2.41
Retrieval-augmented answer (8,000 in, 500 out), per 1,000$0.305$4.80
Confidence signalyesyes
Tool callingyesyes
BANKING77, correct of 400286not measured

Which one should carry your traffic?

If Qwen3.7 Flash answers your requests as well as GLM 5.3, moving that traffic saves 95% on chat-shaped requests. Averages cannot tell you whether it does for your requests. Qwen3.7 Flash exposes a confidence signal, so Gimbix can let it answer first and hand unsure cases to GLM 5.3.

Qwen3.7 Flash profile · GLM 5.3 profile · Measure it on your traffic