Home / Compare / Qwen3.8 27B vs Qwen3.8 Flash

Qwen3.8 27B vs Qwen3.8 Flash

For a typical chat reply (2,000 tokens in, 400 out), Qwen3.8 27B costs 4.2× as much as Qwen3.8 Flash: $2.04 against $0.488 per 1,000 requests at list price on 2026-09-28.

Qwen3.8 27BQwen3.8 Flash
Input, per 1M tokens$0.42$0.15
Output, per 1M tokens$3.00$0.47
Context window1M1M
Classification or routing (600 tokens in, 10 out), per 1,000$0.282$0.0947
Chat reply (2,000 in, 400 out), per 1,000$2.04$0.488
Retrieval-augmented answer (8,000 in, 500 out), per 1,000$4.86$1.44
Confidence signalyesyes
Tool callingyesyes
BANKING77, correct of 400264316

Which one should carry your traffic?

If Qwen3.8 Flash answers your requests as well as Qwen3.8 27B, moving that traffic saves 76% on chat-shaped requests. Averages cannot tell you whether it does for your requests. Qwen3.8 Flash exposes a confidence signal, so Gimbix can let it answer first and hand unsure cases to Qwen3.8 27B.

Qwen3.8 27B profile · Qwen3.8 Flash profile · Measure it on your traffic