Home / Compare / Qwen3.8 Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)

Qwen3.8 Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)

For a typical chat reply (2,000 tokens in, 400 out), Qwen3.8 Max (0902) costs 13× as much as Qwen3.8 Flash: $6.40 against $0.488 per 1,000 requests at list price on 2026-09-28.

Qwen3.8 FlashQwen3.8 Max (0902)
Input, per 1M tokens$0.15$2.00
Output, per 1M tokens$0.47$6.00
Context window1M1M
Classification or routing (600 tokens in, 10 out), per 1,000$0.0947$1.26
Chat reply (2,000 in, 400 out), per 1,000$0.488$6.40
Retrieval-augmented answer (8,000 in, 500 out), per 1,000$1.44$19.00
Confidence signalyesyes
Tool callingyesyes
BANKING77, correct of 400316not measured

Which one should carry your traffic?

If Qwen3.8 Flash answers your requests as well as Qwen3.8 Max (0902), moving that traffic saves 92% on chat-shaped requests. Averages cannot tell you whether it does for your requests. Qwen3.8 Flash exposes a confidence signal, so Gimbix can let it answer first and hand unsure cases to Qwen3.8 Max (0902).

Qwen3.8 Flash profile · Qwen3.8 Max (0902) profile · Measure it on your traffic