Home / Compare / Qwen3.8 Flash vs GLM 5.3 Flash

Qwen3.8 Flash vs GLM 5.3 Flash

For a typical chat reply (2,000 tokens in, 400 out), GLM 5.3 Flash costs about the same as Qwen3.8 Flash: $0.50 against $0.488 per 1,000 requests at list price on 2026-09-28.

Qwen3.8 FlashGLM 5.3 Flash
Input, per 1M tokens$0.15$0.15
Output, per 1M tokens$0.47$0.50
Context window1M1.31M
Classification or routing (600 tokens in, 10 out), per 1,000$0.0947$0.095
Chat reply (2,000 in, 400 out), per 1,000$0.488$0.50
Retrieval-augmented answer (8,000 in, 500 out), per 1,000$1.44$1.45
Confidence signalyesyes
Tool callingyesyes
BANKING77, correct of 400316320

Which one should carry your traffic?

If Qwen3.8 Flash answers your requests as well as GLM 5.3 Flash, moving that traffic saves 2% on chat-shaped requests. Averages cannot tell you whether it does for your requests. Qwen3.8 Flash exposes a confidence signal, so Gimbix can let it answer first and hand unsure cases to GLM 5.3 Flash.

Qwen3.8 Flash profile · GLM 5.3 Flash profile · Measure it on your traffic