Home / Compare / Claude Sonnet 5 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)

Claude Sonnet 5 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)

For a typical chat reply (2,000 tokens in, 400 out), Claude Sonnet 5 costs 1.3× as much as Qwen3.8 Max (0902): $8.00 against $6.40 per 1,000 requests at list price on 2026-09-28.

Claude Sonnet 5Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Input, per 1M tokens$2.00$2.00
Output, per 1M tokens$10.00$6.00
Context window1M1M
Classification or routing (600 tokens in, 10 out), per 1,000$1.30$1.26
Chat reply (2,000 in, 400 out), per 1,000$8.00$6.40
Retrieval-augmented answer (8,000 in, 500 out), per 1,000$21.00$19.00
Confidence signalnoyes
Tool callingyesyes
BANKING77, correct of 400308not measured

Which one should carry your traffic?

If Qwen3.8 Max (0902) answers your requests as well as Claude Sonnet 5, moving that traffic saves 20% on chat-shaped requests. Averages cannot tell you whether it does for your requests. Qwen3.8 Max (0902) exposes a confidence signal, so Gimbix can let it answer first and hand unsure cases to Claude Sonnet 5.

Claude Sonnet 5 profile · Qwen3.8 Max (0902) profile · Measure it on your traffic