Home / Compare / Gemma 4 31B vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)

Gemma 4 31B vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)

For a typical chat reply (2,000 tokens in, 400 out), Qwen3.8 Max (0902) costs 20× as much as Gemma 4 31B: $6.40 against $0.316 per 1,000 requests at list price on 2026-09-28.

Gemma 4 31BQwen3.8 Max (0902)
Input, per 1M tokens$0.09$2.00
Output, per 1M tokens$0.34$6.00
Context window262K1M
Classification or routing (600 tokens in, 10 out), per 1,000$0.0574$1.26
Chat reply (2,000 in, 400 out), per 1,000$0.316$6.40
Retrieval-augmented answer (8,000 in, 500 out), per 1,000$0.89$19.00
Confidence signalyesyes
Tool callingyesyes
BANKING77, correct of 400304not measured

Which one should carry your traffic?

If Gemma 4 31B answers your requests as well as Qwen3.8 Max (0902), moving that traffic saves 95% on chat-shaped requests. Averages cannot tell you whether it does for your requests. Gemma 4 31B exposes a confidence signal, so Gimbix can let it answer first and hand unsure cases to Qwen3.8 Max (0902).

Gemma 4 31B profile · Qwen3.8 Max (0902) profile · Measure it on your traffic