Home / Compare / MiniMax M3 vs Qwen3.8 27B

MiniMax M3 vs Qwen3.8 27B

For a typical chat reply (2,000 tokens in, 400 out), Qwen3.8 27B costs 1.9× as much as MiniMax M3: $2.04 against $1.08 per 1,000 requests at list price on 2026-09-28.

MiniMax M3Qwen3.8 27B
Input, per 1M tokens$0.30$0.42
Output, per 1M tokens$1.20$3.00
Context window1.05M1M
Classification or routing (600 tokens in, 10 out), per 1,000$0.192$0.282
Chat reply (2,000 in, 400 out), per 1,000$1.08$2.04
Retrieval-augmented answer (8,000 in, 500 out), per 1,000$3.00$4.86
Confidence signalyesyes
Tool callingyesyes
BANKING77, correct of 400316264

Which one should carry your traffic?

If MiniMax M3 answers your requests as well as Qwen3.8 27B, moving that traffic saves 47% on chat-shaped requests. Averages cannot tell you whether it does for your requests. MiniMax M3 exposes a confidence signal, so Gimbix can let it answer first and hand unsure cases to Qwen3.8 27B.

MiniMax M3 profile · Qwen3.8 27B profile · Measure it on your traffic