Home / Compare / Mistral Large 3 2512 vs Qwen3.8 27B

Mistral Large 3 2512 vs Qwen3.8 27B

For a typical chat reply (2,000 tokens in, 400 out), Qwen3.8 27B costs 1.3× as much as Mistral Large 3 2512: $2.04 against $1.60 per 1,000 requests at list price on 2026-09-28.

Mistral Large 3 2512Qwen3.8 27B
Input, per 1M tokens$0.50$0.42
Output, per 1M tokens$1.50$3.00
Context window262K1M
Classification or routing (600 tokens in, 10 out), per 1,000$0.315$0.282
Chat reply (2,000 in, 400 out), per 1,000$1.60$2.04
Retrieval-augmented answer (8,000 in, 500 out), per 1,000$4.75$4.86
Confidence signalnoyes
Tool callingyesyes
BANKING77, correct of 400not measured264

Which one should carry your traffic?

If Mistral Large 3 2512 answers your requests as well as Qwen3.8 27B, moving that traffic saves 22% on chat-shaped requests. Averages cannot tell you whether it does for your requests. Mistral Large 3 2512 does not expose a confidence signal through OpenRouter, so Gimbix would test it as a full replacement rather than a first answer.

Mistral Large 3 2512 profile · Qwen3.8 27B profile · Measure it on your traffic