Home / Compare / Mistral Small 4 vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Mistral Small 4 vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash

For a typical chat reply (2,000 tokens in, 400 out), Mistral Small 4 costs 1.4× as much as MiMo-V2.6-Flash: $0.54 against $0.392 per 1,000 requests at list price on 2026-09-28.

Mistral Small 4MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Input, per 1M tokens$0.15$0.14
Output, per 1M tokens$0.60$0.28
Context window262K1.05M
Classification or routing (600 tokens in, 10 out), per 1,000$0.096$0.0868
Chat reply (2,000 in, 400 out), per 1,000$0.54$0.392
Retrieval-augmented answer (8,000 in, 500 out), per 1,000$1.50$1.26
Confidence signalnono
Tool callingyesyes
BANKING77, correct of 400not measured326

Which one should carry your traffic?

If MiMo-V2.6-Flash answers your requests as well as Mistral Small 4, moving that traffic saves 27% on chat-shaped requests. Averages cannot tell you whether it does for your requests. MiMo-V2.6-Flash does not expose a confidence signal through OpenRouter, so Gimbix would test it as a full replacement rather than a first answer.

Mistral Small 4 profile · MiMo-V2.6-Flash profile · Measure it on your traffic