Home / Compare / DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs Kimi K2.6

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs Kimi K2.6

For a typical chat reply (2,000 tokens in, 400 out), Kimi K2.6 costs 16× as much as DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731: $2.66 against $0.17 per 1,000 requests at list price on 2026-09-28.

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731Kimi K2.6
Input, per 1M tokens$0.021$0.65
Output, per 1M tokens$0.32$3.41
Context window1.31M262K
Classification or routing (600 tokens in, 10 out), per 1,000$0.0158$0.424
Chat reply (2,000 in, 400 out), per 1,000$0.17$2.66
Retrieval-augmented answer (8,000 in, 500 out), per 1,000$0.328$6.91
Confidence signalyesyes
Tool callingyesyes
BANKING77, correct of 400298323

Which one should carry your traffic?

If DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 answers your requests as well as Kimi K2.6, moving that traffic saves 94% on chat-shaped requests. Averages cannot tell you whether it does for your requests. DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 exposes a confidence signal, so Gimbix can let it answer first and hand unsure cases to Kimi K2.6.

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 profile · Kimi K2.6 profile · Measure it on your traffic